Equality of Men & Women

       Male/Female        - Nature/Nurture        Anima/Animus

This discussion is not about equality based on gender, race or cultural "norms", instead       
it is based on the reality of equality of Personhood.  Culturally-based: beliefs, practices and
standards differ widely across cultures and communities, hence "personhood" is the basic
commonality to use for a discussion on this.
It's an open discussion: I hope to engage you in
dialogue on this: please send me  your views, thoughts and suggestions.

Thus there is a danger in comparing one's own situation to someone else's if one doesn't
understand this crucial point.

Equality: both men and women should enjoy, and receive, equality of personhood:
equality of dignity, mutual respect, harmony, complementarity,
and if they are in a committed relationship; a unified destiny.

While they may be "hard-wired" differently - the effects of that on actual daily life are
still hotly disputed - see below.
Of course, there are differences between males and females - but this is often reduced     
to being primarily
biological. Biology doesn't dictate "better" or "lesser".
It just means: difference.

How the biology affects human conduct and behaviour is the source of an ongoing debate -
one that has yet to be resolved.
Regardless of biological differences - the main point is, there is an equality of personhood  
that must be regarded as the most important criteria.

Actually, when it comes to "differences", most of them are
Cultural, not biological.

Within the
equality of personhood and the equality there are some special qualities that a
man has because he is man, and that woman has because she is woman.
There is an equality of  harmony:  meaning that there has to be peaceful cooperation
between men and women. We should find ways to smooth the path of our relationships.

There is and equality of
complementarity. This is somewhat like saying that our
relationships should not be merely the sound of singing in unison as in music.
  • It can only be the integrated sound of the various voices, whether soprano and      
    bass, alto and tenor. That way, the differences of male and female are respected,  
    affirmed and valued.

It also ensures that males and females won't try to duplicate each other; instead, an
opportunity to highlight each other's unique qualities exists that allows mutual       
enrichment.

There is an equality of fairness; an equality of being treated on the basis of merit,      
rather than gender; and an equality of being acknowledged and responded to - again,         
as  a unique individual, and not because of gender.

There is no room for, or need for, the essences and effects of twisted, dysfunctional
maleness and femaleness that is a self-aggrandizing effort to subdue and control and
exploit the other for their own private desires and enrichment.

There are several examples on this site, of what happens to those who are unsuccessful:
Dysfunctional Families/Relationships, Codependency, or  Comparing Healthy-Unhealthy
Relationships. You may also wish to read "The Rules For Being Human".

Generally, men have more brute strength than women, and many abuse that strength         
by trying to dominate women (and children) through intimidation,  violence and abuse -      
and look to be "waited on hand-and-foot".   
But this is also true of many women. Women might have as much brute strength as men   
they have, and try to use that way to gain dominance.

But, they often tend to use words, and where her words fail her, she knows the other
weaknesses to capitalize on. Neither of these so-called "gender" behaviours is good,
desirable, adaptive, healthy or functional.

Many  men and women have been raised without a positive vision of what it means to be  
male or female. They have been told (and all too often, seen) many negative things:      
things humans ought not to be, things humans are to be liberated from.
Nature/Nurture: There has been no intent to ignore biological differences. Instead,    
the focus has been on the
cultural (learned) ones. The "nature-nurture" controversy    
and debate is still going strongly.

It is not likely to be settled for a long time: however, there is some consensus that       
at  best we can say that human (both male and female) are a blend of inherent,    
biological and perhaps inherited characteristics, AND cultural (learned) ones.

In the context and spirit of this article, the best we can say is, that the blend will be
different for each individual: for example:

Emotional Differences between female/Male: that there are differences goes     
without saying. Whether the emotions themselves are different between the       
genders  is open to question: perhaps it is safest to say that each gender has        
learned  how to experience, and express, them differently.

When we take the time to really get to know another person, we discover a rich  
emotional life - expressed uniquely learned factors (nurture) is also open to         
question  - and the subject of an ongoing debate.

Another point people often use is to say that men and women think differently, that    
they use two "logics".

Sexuality - Sex "drive" differences between male/female. Here too, the
nature/nurture factor is involved. First, as applying to "differences" between         
males  and females as far as their sexuality and their sex drives are concerned.        
And   secondly,
within relationships. People commonly speak of one or the other  having
high, or low, sex drives (libidos). And these are often ascribed to inherent differences
between male and female.

Yet, in reality, there are many members of both genders who have so-called "high"      
sex drives, as there are those with so-called "low" sex drives. Actually, "high-low"       
are relative terms: relative only to two individuals. It is common that in many, many
relationships there are differences in approach, desire etc between the two        
partners.

And it is they who tend to describe those differences in terms of "high", or "low" -    
when instead the focus should be on the fact that they are
different, and ways of  
finding a mutually satisfying resolution to the difference should be sought, rather       
than "blaming" or "labelling".

After all, there are many factors that impinge on sex-drive: for example, health,  
fatigue, stress etc - all of which have little, or nothing, to do with maleness or  
femaleness.

Anima/Animus: in the midst of this "controversy", there is something else to       
consider. This is Carl Gustuv Jung's concept of Anima/Animus: the male/female    
aspects each gender carries within. It means that a female has a preponderance of
femaleness (
anima), yet at the same time has within her psyche her opposite        
maleness.

Males, conversely, have a preponderance of maleness (animus), yet carry within         
their psyche its opposite - the anima.

Thus, not only does nature/nurture come into play - it is also how the internal psychic
balance of
anima (femaleness) and animus (maleness) are blended and harmonized.     
This whole concept is also related to yin-yang, and left-brain / right-brain.
This is not intended to be "the" definitive work on this topic, but anything that        
leads to improved understanding, points of view, acceptance and more functional       
behaviour and attitudes can only be good.
Please join me in dialogue on this        
important facet of real human life (email or snail mail - see "Contact/Comments").

It is an introduction that will be revised on an ongoing basis:
I think it is summed-up nicely in this tribute to the late Fritz Perls:

How We Are (a philosophy to live by)
"If I just do my thing and you do yours, We stand in danger of losing each other        
and ourselves.
I am not in this world to live up to your expectations; but I am in this world to     
confirm you as a unique human being, and to be confirmed by you.
We are fully ourselves only in relation to each other; the I detached from a Thou
disintegrates.
I do not find you by chance; I find you by an active life of reaching out.  Rather than
passively letting things happen to me, I can act intentionally to make them happen.  
I must begin with myself, true; but I must not end with myself: the Truth begins      
with two".
- "Beyond Perls" (Walter Tubbs)

Klaas Tuinman MA
Dawn Cove Abbey
Deerfield, (Yarmouth County) Nova Scotia, Canada
2010-rev 2017
Equality of Personhood between Women and Men
Male - Female (Gender) Equality
         Essay on the Fundamental Basics
Some Definitions and Realities we each face are:
1. Men are from Earth
Women are from Earth.
That's our starting point - "equal planetary residence"

2.
Not all women are alike.
Some women are more evolved than other women.

3.
Not all men are alike.  
Some men are more evolved than other men.

4.
Gender identity is the sense we have of belonging either to the male portion of        
the human race or the female portion of the race.

5.
Gender conceit is when either gender assumes that what is natural and         
preferred  for her/his gender is correct for both genders.

We are ALL unique individuals.
Those qualities exist because of their differences: differences because they are each
unique individuals. In showing
mutual respect and care there are special ways that a     
man shows respect to a woman; and vice versa.

Equality of personhood and mutuality of respect is
not sameness. Yes, there is a
"sameness" of qualities and equal access to all qualities - but they remain unique,  and
different: full individual - striving to fulfil their
potential.

Equality is expressed differently in the way we relate to each other as man and woman,  
not because we are male and female, but because of our respective, unique personhoods.
And those personhoods are manifested in the two individuals in a relationship, or     
situation: they each have a specialness that needs to be recognized, honoured and
respected.

Equality of personhood means that a man is not less a person than a woman because he   
has hair on his chest. They are equal in their personhood and those differences don't  
change that - in fact, they aren't relevant.

There is an
equality of dignity. A dignity which requires them to be equally honoured as
humans.  That honour is due to each simply because they are humans - this applies to all
people in our lives: that honour belongs to male and female equally (whether as adults, or  
as children).

There is an equality of
mutual respect. And it means that both men and women should be
equally diligent in respecting and honouring each other.

Respect should never flow just one direction: they should regard each other with a kind    
of awe that is tempered by the reality of who each is - and accepting them fully, "warts  
and all".
Dawn Cove Abbey
_______________________________
Roadside Assistance For Your Journey Through Life
- Dedicated to helping people return (and maintain) sanity and decency to life -
_______________________________________________________
From the eBook: "One! The Journey hOMe", by Klaas Tuinman MA, © 2007-2017

Questions and comments welcomed.
Liberation (and enlightenment) means that manhood does not consist of sexual exploitation:
that a man is not just characterized by cool, rational unemotionalism.
Nor is maleness only the ruthless task-oriented drive to conquer. Conversely,         
womanhood is not boring domesticity, nor homebound motherhood. Femaleness is not           
just some mindless emotionalism, nor passive sexual compliance.

Now that we have seen what manhood and womanhood is NOT, and what it
IS          
(tentatively and conditionally)
, what are we left with in our society? The main thing is a        
big void of confusion about who and what they are: frustrating, guilt-producing,     
destructive, dysfunctional confusion.

Many couples have a clear vision of what it means to be a husband and a wife (or      
committed partners).  That confusion has a profound effect on the stability of
marriage/relationships and the way the children will be prepared for life as male and    
female.

That confusion ends when both partners gain insight and clarity with regard to the        
other's uniqueness and of their relationship as completely singular in terms of what will  help
it survive or not, in short, come to understand and accept each other.

There are advocates who insist that relationships should be fair, and that there is            
some standard to which all relationships should be compared to.

To clarify what that means, or doesn't mean, it would be helpful to regard Camilia        
Paglia's work (books): uncontrollable, often self defeating urges and very different   
agendas depending on one's gender. (See, for example Paglia,
Vamps and Tramps).

Sexual equality may be possible - but not extremely likely according to Paglia. She indicates   
that the belief that when "equality" is achieved it will result in complete ease in relationships.
Impossible, she says.

And this is due, she goes on, because men and women are vastly different and their    
differences, though creating an often chaotic world for one and other, are what passion is        
all about (see more on sexual/emotional differences below).

Relationships are never completely balanced: there is always some degree of hierarchy.   
Actually, relationships function often on many hierarchies simultaneously, and balances         
shift during the course of relationships, often many times.

The "raw material" which makes up one relationship is completely different from any other,    
and gauging balance against other relationships, or the ideal of complete equity in all    
regards    is futile, impossible.

Paglia says, "(those who) see every hierarchy as repressive, are practicing a social fiction       
that rejects contingency, that is, human limitation by nature or fate (3,
Sexual Personae)."

Caring is good. Some people care more than others, and caring often endures despite
inequity. Thankfully, we live in a world in which caring can shower itself on the good,  bad     
and ugly. Sometimes this results in imbalance.

Imbalance is not necessarily bad, and to regard it that way would require us to          
consider  the most altruistic individuals in history as flawed. A mind-set result that   
examines  many caring behaviours, and the possibility that some many need modification    
while others  may not.

This attitudinal/behavioural approach can be applied to almost any situation where
disagreement, tension, hurt, discord, lack of harmony and other problems exist - by       
either gender (or both genders, depending on the circumstances).